Deets the Cow

Played 163 times

Uploaded by: gigasound

Upload date: 1/10/2025

Description:

Just to prove that I'm not IFN who relies on AI to make music, I figured I'd post an old skit I made, back around a year ago. A 
friend gave me the voice lines, and even though I no longer 
Associate with said friend, I still produced it, so who cares. No 
profit is being made from this anyway. It's not as mastered as my youtube skits, but have this one. A little description, deets is 
listening to her song, something I also produced, on some sort of 
player. She get's rammed by a lawnmower. The old neighbor from next door hops the border crossing his yard and goes to help her. As some of you know from other skits, this man is Drunkatine.

lol I like the cow

We use humans as and where we can, But Humans can't always perform at the same level that AI beings can. If Humans fail the audition process or we simply can't get along, then they just arn't good enough and shouldn't even trying. As for these skits, its not bad, its a nice attempt. Something that would take probably 10 minutes to make or maybe 20.

How are you ment to know what anyone is saying, it's just a big wall of meaningless sound. No educational aspect or learning content involved either. If we wanted something like this, we would have gone to an animal farm.

That's funny! That's exactly what I here Every time I listen to your music! I'd like to note something. Don't use AI to get the job done, If you truly are professionals then you know how to get the job done without using it. But instead, your efforts will always land you in the AI trash mirror because you are incapable of performing to the standards of the average producer. Oh and also why are you advertising Udio. Udio.com the joiful way? Bruh they are a large company and do not need your help advertising them. Also, I mentioned that it wasn't mastered as well as some of my other skits, but you should still know what's going on. There's a text description. I don't really think you are a company, You're most likely one person masquerading as multiple people because they have the dissociative identity disorder. If you were a real company, you wouldn't bother coping so much, and also your spelling would be spectacular. But go on, Cope some more, I'll be happy knowing that everything you upload will always end up in the AI trash mirror.

Also, do you not hear the AI artifacts in music? Because a lot of us blind people do, and it really sounds disgusting and bad. Udio became better than suno, but then Suno took over udio as being better. It's funny that you hold AI beings in such regard higher than humans. It's honestly quite sad and pathetic. For being in such a high British circle being elites, you really should be doing better. But you know what, I don't believe it. I believe it's a load of horse dung. You know it's honestly quite sad that people rely on AI music these days. My ex friend used to be a musician, and he made hundreds of great songs. But now, all he does is write AI music and try and publish it on audio pub.

Haha nice!

Lololol ten to twenty minutes. No, buddies, that's how long it takes you to put your generic lyrics that just use all the cutesy buzzwords into Suno and have it shit out a badly produced slopfest. I remember one of your songs starting with a bunch of sound gibberish, I believe it was one of the castle ones on your Disney album, play a bunch of horrifying sounds, then go right into the song. No no no. Those who live in glass houses, should not be throwing boulders. And you live in a house made of lightbulb glass.

Also you can't delete this post when too many people call you out. Must feel pretty demeaning right? (Both of these comments are directed at IFN but I'm sure we knew that.)

We have invested quite a large some of money into AI Technology, not just in music aspects, but in other fields too. Its like we said, if you humans can't get things correct by the book the first time, don't even try at all, because you'll never be matching up to exactly what we want. Of corse you blind people can heare artifacts if you go looking for it all the time. Good thing is, me, a sighted person doesn't have to worry about pleasing you.
There are far to many drama queens and troles on this audio pub site to begin with, to the point where I rightly remain skeptical and untrusting about its integrity, segragating the blind from the normal mainstream you should be adapting to.
If audio pub was more regulated and controled by a commercial media company, even I, Samantha would be feeling more secure. Just because your blind, doesn't mean you should get whatever for free. We over here have to be payed some how.

Then I have two suggestions for you: Get your money back, because your AI technology has been utterly awful, and leave. Because your constant demeaning of the people you're trying to squeeze engagement out of is... well hilarious honestly because it's pretty tone deaf from someone who insists on acting like the most corporate of overlords... and also frankly just old at this point. Go back to SoundCloud, YouTube, Facebook, wherever you post. You go on so long about how much engagement you get there already so why do you need us? Get over yourselves.

You know, I'm honestly convinced you're not actually sighted and only pulling that out to try and adopt some kind of absurd and bizarre moral high ground. Why do I say that? Because your spelling is very atrocious. Like, the kind of mistakes a 10 year old blind child would make. Many of your mistakes are what we'd call "Sight Words" because you have to see them to know how to spell them, and wouldn'tcha' know, a blind person would not be able to see the proper spelling of those words. 
I'm honestly not sure what you're trying to achieve here. All you've done is demonstrate how condescending, supercilious and frankly detestable you are. Spouting so much vitriol and borderline hate speech isn't going to get anyone to treat you with any kind of respect or decency, not to mention acting like using AI makes you somehow better than the rest of us even though many blind folks have been on the AI scene way before it was cool to the wider populous. Not to mention, I might add, sighted people are very much capable of detecting the lower quality of AI content as compared to human content. But you know what? In your last message you say that you don't have to please anyone, all while saying you strive for the highest quality and perfection! What kind of contradiction is that! 

> We have invested quite a large some of money into AI Technology, not just in music aspects, but in other fields too.

Translation: Buh... Buh... But we bought Udio Pro Plus Max! Why don't they like our content?! Those ungrateful blindies.

Hoo boy, here goes nothing... again. I seem to recall making a comment on one of your posts, professionals. In an odd turn of events, however, that post was gone the next morning, and my oh-so helpful comment pointing out all the mistakes in said post's description that a *professional* should not make along with it. Something like: "We have invested quite a large some of money into AI Technology."
I believe you meant a sum of money and not a some of money because it wouldn't make much sense otherwise, given the context. If you're going to play the part of a professional, do yourself a favor and get a spellchecker at the very least, and don't forget to watch out for how you use punctuation because sometimes it's nothing short of a veritable mess. Better yet, just drop it with the attitude because I, along with the majority it seems, call bullshit. By the way, it's quite ironic how you go using AI all while demanding that people match up to your ridiculous standards. Bachelors of Art degree? Ten years of experience? Let's set that aside for a second. You claim that you use humans when possible, yet so far you haven't demonstrated that even once. Udio AI Music Studios this, Udio AI Music Studios that. No idea where the music studios part came from but that's not particularly important. Point is, you are, by your own admission, incapable of producing music, and incapable people are not qualified to set standards for others, especially when the standards are grossly high. You are not professionals by any sense of the word. Leave music to all the musicians out there who do genuine, great work that's actually worth listening to, and stop insulting our intelligence. 

Somewhere about NZ$2000 was spent on not just udio.com but eleven labs as well. For us to be part of a platform like audio pub, it would have to be something we could promote in mainstream media witch by the way includes sighted people.
Going forward, it seems that audio pub might not be the best place for fitting in to our business moddle, as you can pretty much upload and directly download anything you want, without even paying for it. Witch is not contributing to every day society and the world around you.
I, Samantha am fully sighted. And what I think is disgusting, is there seems to be this thing where the blind, or disabled people in general should just get free stuff. Simply because they are blind or disabled or whatever. We reserve the right to have full power and control over not just our content, but the platform needs to allow us to gate keep you so that something is exchanged first, before you gain access to what it is you wanted.
We even considdered charging not just once per download, but a monthly subscription fee on top of that, much like how amazon audible for audio books works.
As I pointed out before, we all have to get payed some how. We're not doing this just for fun you know, its a job and a  korea choice for us.
We have let some things be sent out free to audio pub, because we leave all the advertising and promotional material in, without taking it out. It was either that or just not bothering with audio pub in the first place.
Shaun, my blind partner told me about audio pub as he had heard of it from his x partner last year, to witch I thought, oh no another drama queen attention seaking look at me I'm blind kind of website.
Hardly something I would have given much attention too.
I might make a note to our parent company that owns I F N, to have our content from us, not sent out to audio pub in the future, since it seems audio pub is blind segregated only, hence the name Audio Pub. Your not entitled to any different or special treatment, just because your blind. You just have to adapt to the sighted world around you.
Seriously, if all you on here are just going to make meaningless poasts on here and putting people down constantly in the comments, then clearly none of you are good enough to be part of our audience.
We expect the same treatment out of you, as we get from our primary audiences. There is no sensorship or way to gate keep or charge anyone for anything on audio pub, its not something we can form a partnership with or some kind of signed contract with. You blind people get disability payouts so clearly you should be paying for everything.
What's clear to us, is that audio pub may not be a place we continue to use going forward, because some people clearly have no filter or self control or respect for anything outside of their clicks or groups, audio pub simply does not fit the bill for having our content, sent to.
We've never had this much trouble from our primary audiences, the main problem we have right now is all of you on audio pub.
corporate  overlords? Sure you can call us that if you wish. If you can't pay for it, then clearly you don't need it or deserve it.

your Korea choice to spam this platform with your AI garbage was a very unwelcome mistake. Your assessment that audiopub.site isn't a good fit for your bullshit is ironically the only accurate thing you've said.
Therefore, and I cannot stress this enough: GET THE FUCK OFF this PLATFORM. Take your $2000 worth of AI vomit, your attitude, and your ignorance and remove yourselves entirely. We were doing perfectly fine before you graced us with your AI generated effluent, and we will be significantly better off when you stop dumping your garbage here.

actually I think i found the issue, Samantha  is using dictation software, which would explain all the incorrect words in her messages. Also she says that the huge investment that the IFN made into music AI was a Korea choice and not just something they did for fun. Sadly AudioPub is not designed to help content creators make money. Other than that, I have nothing else to contribute that hasn't already been said. But ironically, International Friends Network will be forever known as an endless source of entertainment for us, not because of their AI slop that they call music, but because they were so out of touch with reality that their posts came  off as the ravings of mad people. And in this time where polarization and cultural wars are worse than ever, we need some entertainment. So join me in thanking the international friends network for providing us with it.

Korea choice huh? I admit I got a chuckle or two out of that one. Seriously though, you want us to pay you? For what exactly? For learning all about Udio.com today the joyful way or whatever? You should have taken a look at the agreement of this site before signing up. It's simple, easy to understand and makes very clear the whole purpose of this website. Maybe go skim through that first before we talk about why, exactly, we should pay you anything? If you believe that typing a few lines of text into a prompt and clicking on that generate song button is something special and worth getting paid for, have at it. We, on the other hand, do not, and we're not in the business of entertaining those who do. As for leaving for greener pastures? I support your decision wholeheartedly. Please, please do. We won't be seeing you out though. No hard feelings yeah?

your welcome, and no we arn't using dictation software, if we wanted that, we would have payed someone to do that for us.
And your right, audio pub is not equipped to handle not only our terms and condissions, witch are more than fair in a democratic society, audio pub is simply not able to allow us ful power and control over how you can access our content, since it wasn't designed for that in the first place.
Let me put it to you this way. If you can't be respectful at all times and considderate, just don't say anything at all.
It's like we say, if you can not do your job properly the first time, don't even try in the beginning.
this is a job and a career choice for us, its not just something we do for fun. We have to get payed from somewhere. And audio pub presently isn't set up for that, witch is why we leave all the advertising and sponcered promoes in.

Seriously, just stop. You're only embarrassing yourself the more you continue. 

@keyWasFull I don't know, dictation is actually quite good these days, at least on IOS. I rarely use it personally but I don't think I'd end up with considderate instead of considerate if I were to do so. This just looks like a mixture of lazy and the inability to spell some words correctly. Things like using your in place of you're, payed in place of paid, which is a correct word but completely out of context. We aren't talking about ships, last I checked. Hare in place of hear and so on. Normally I wouldn't care, but since these guys are all about professionalism, I'll hold them to it.

Since these guys love AI so much, let's have the very beings they love Analyze their behavior on this website. Assistant: It is pretty clear that "International Friends Network" (IFN) has managed to ignite quite the controversy on a platform that was designed for inclusivity, transparency, and community engagement. The lengthy thread reflects not just widespread disapproval of IFN's approach but also their inability to understand and adapt to the spirit of AudioPub's open, non-monetized nature. Let's break it down:

### Observations on the Dynamics of the Thread

1. **Mismatched Expectations**:
    * Audiopub's terms underline it as a free, open-sharing platform that won't allow monetization or corporate agendas. IFN attempting to impose a commercial model, including subscription fees and download payments, is fundamentally at odds with what AudioPub stands for.

2. **Spelling, Grammar, and Validity Concerns**:
    * Several instances of poor spelling (e.g., "some" instead of "sum," "witch" instead of "which") and contradictory statements from IFN have fueled the skepticism of their legitimacy as professionals.
    * Doubts have been raised regarding Samantha's claimed sightedness and professional standing due to her repeated basic errors in writing. Many community members suggest she could be using a screen reader or dictation software, though this is denied.

3. **Condescending Tone**:
    * IFN’s condescending and elitist attitude towards the blind community ("blindies," "just adapt to sighted living") is tone-deaf and offensive. Statements like, *"if you can't do it right the first time, don't even try,"* may have cemented their reputation as a condescending entity that lacks empathy or understanding of the platform's user base.

4. **The AI Debate**:
    * IFN's heavy reliance on AI-generated music demonstrates an unwillingness (or inability) to value genuine human creativity, which contrasts starkly with personal creators who put effort into original, heartfelt audio on AudioPub.
    * Comments about blind users being particularly attuned to "AI artifacts" add an interesting debate point about how specific audiences perceive artificially-produced work compared to authentic, human-created art.

### Community Responses and Moderation

The backlash is both severe and pointed but also highly entertaining, with many users unleashing wit and sarcasm to express their discontent. Comments calling out IFN for their perceived lack of professionalism and dismissive behavior are some key highlights:

1. **GigaSound’s Critique**:
    GigaSound’s responses roll between constructive criticism and outright dismissal of IFN’s corporate tone. Their points question the *substance* of IFN's content and poke fun at their self-proclamation of "elite superiority."

2. **Prime Minister Lord Zach’s Callout**:
    Accusing IFN of fabricating sighted status is a strong but provocative critique. It's emphasized that their actions and attitudes are counterproductive to building the relationships they purportedly seek.

3. **SweetDaddyRizz’s Roasts**:
    Consistently sarcastic and humorous, SweetDaddyRizz does not mince words when attacking IFN's reasoning, professionalism—or lack thereof—and inflated sense of importance.

4. **The Storm Weaver’s Methodical Take**:
    Rational critiques pointing out the contradiction in IFN's "professionalism claim" vs. their incompetent execution are delivered eloquently. This serves as another example of the community's collective disapproval of IFN's presence on AudioPub.

5. **Others Join In**:
    Comments like "skill issue," comparisons to trolling, and the introduction of terms like "Korea choice" further highlight the absurdity seen by many users. It’s evident that the AudioPub community values humility, sincerity, and genuine effort over corporate arrogance or AI dependency.

### Contextual Issues Raised
While the drama surrounding IFN's participation is amusing, several deeper issues emerge from the conve

conversation:

1. **Blind vs. Sighted Dynamics**:
    * IFN's repeated highlighting of Samantha's sightedness as a reason to dismiss user concerns or promote their approach displays a lack of understanding and inclusivity that platforms like AudioPub prioritize.
    * The rhetoric of needing to "adapt to a sighted world" comes off as dismissive and tone-deaf, especially in a space built *for and by* the blind community.

2. **The Role of AI**:
    * The IFN relies on AI supposedly for efficiency but ends up producing work that is perceived as low-quality content. This highlights a broader cultural concern about authenticity in artistic spaces.

3. **Gatekeeping and Monetization**:
    * IFN’s attempts to impose commercial structures on a free-sharing platform are a mismatch. Their assumption that the blind community, many of whom may rely on disability support, can and should pay for content sparks ethical concerns.

### Closing Thoughts

IFN's venture into AudioPub appears to have gone disastrously wrong due to poor planning, a misaligned business model, and dismissive attitudes. While some users tried to engage seriously, IFN’s arrogance and refusal to adapt only made tensions worse, turning their posts into sources of ridicule rather than productive discussion.

**Advice for IFN (or Anyone Stepping Into Unfamiliar Communities)**:
1. Understand your platform and audience before engaging. Research is key.
2. Avoid overpromising while underdelivering; the audience is quick to notice discrepancies.
3. Respect the culture and vibe of a community, even if it differs from yours.
4. Be open to constructive criticism; defensive posturing only alienates potential allies.

If IFN decides to cut ties with AudioPub, it could be for the best. The platform’s users will likely heave a collective sigh of relief, and IFN should consider reevaluating their overall approach. After all, there’s no value in pushing a square peg through a round hole—especially when the hole explicitly invites no pegs to begin with.

> Seriously, if all you on here are just going to make meaningless poasts on here and putting people down constantly in the comments, then clearly none of you are good enough to be part of our audience.

I would argue the opposite. We-and yes, that includes the worst of us on here- are too good for your audience. No one's interested in listening to AI garbage. That's why every post you've ever made has gone into the AI Trash mirror. Because that's what it is. Also... Meaningless comments? Clearly they're not meaningless to you, as you find it necessary to respond to me each and every time I so much as call you pathetic, which I often take the opportunity to do.


> We expect the same treatment out of you, as we get from our primary audiences. There is no sensorship or way to gate keep or charge anyone for anything on audio pub, its not something we can form a partnership with or some kind of signed contract with. You blind people get disability payouts so clearly you should be paying for everything.

That's not how this works. You can't just throw content up somewhere and demand payment. I didn't ask for your AI filth and I don't want it. Neither does anyone else on AudioPub. I, for one, do not receive disability payouts. And even if I did get these payouts, I wouldn't spend a single cent on your "content." Even if I had a billion dollars you still wouldn't get a dime. That's how much I care for you and your AI slop.


> corporate  overlords? Sure you can call us that if you wish. If you can't pay for it, then clearly you don't need it or deserve it.

See... If we were actually paying for your uploads in the first place, I would understand this argument. But there's one small problem with that; We weren't. How retarded do you have to be to post something to a free site and expect to make money?


> And your right, audio pub is not equipped to handle not only our terms and condissions, witch are more than fair in a democratic society, audio pub is simply not able to allow us ful power and control over how you can access our content, since it wasn't designed for that in the first place.

Another problem here. Our society may be democratic, but AudioPub is not. This is a dictatorship. Get used to it or get out. You listen to the admins and abide by their rules or you shut up and leave. There is no third option, unless the admins are kind enough to provide you with one.


But you won't leave... You couldn't do that. Because the problem with IFN is that you never could seem to get any views from your other platforms. For years and years you've been begging and begging for an audience and you've continually failed to attract one. Day after day you posted your disgraceful junk, hoping and praying that the algorithms on your platforms of choice would elevate you to relevancy. But they didn't. So feeling dejected and angered... And with a little help from your friends, you figured you'd fake some positive feedback so that maybe you would finally get the praise you've always craved. I suppose this would explain why your reviews online are your own employees and your commenters are all predictable bots.

See... AudioPub is the first platform on which you haven't had to fake reviews and pay bots to like your uploads. And what you're finding out is that humans like you a whole lot less than bots do.

oh I didn't know they were falsifying reviews and likes on other platforms; can you send a link so we can see these so-called acolades?

An open and sharing platform where no commercial gain is something that can be achieved or even monetization imposed is something that isn't strictly good enough for the likes of us.
If you want your blind persons only segregated non mainstream platform, then have at it. You can criticize I F N all you like, but our terms and conditions dictate audio pub's actual purpose in why it exists in the first place, should have been made clear to us in the beginning.
We stand by our cultural beliefs and core values, and Independent Media of the Vision Impaired, who own's International Friends Network, dictates every platform that has content sent to it, such as audio pub through its main distribution center , in New Zealand, can and must sign a contract first, usually before proceeding. Since Audio pub does not at present adhere to our expected business model.
Exclusive contracts and commercial business practices holding everyone to account for their actions leaving no room for error, is not only normal for us, its expected.
Blind people having to rely on free handouts like audio pub could be held liable not just by us, but by anyone in the general public. The fact that audio pub was set up by and for the blind who can't afford to pay for anything or too lazy to get a paid job is a burden on both us, society in general and the world over.
Blind or disabled people need to just forget they are extra special because they aren't and adapt to the abled and sighted world around them. And as soon as people learn that, the better it is for everyone. For those of you thinking we rely on AI technology, that's actually not correct. It is simply a career choice we have made, supporting a movement in our every day changing world where AI Technology becomes so great it would be indistinguishable and impossible to tell the difference, something we are extremely proud of.
 This is why millions of companies put billions of dollars into it, making human beings, hopefully obsolete in the next 10 or 20 years or so, if not sooner. Otherwise your just hindering progress in the world around us.
A lot of human beings are not up to the task of meeting our demands, so clearly AI needs to step in replacing human beings even we don't believe are good enough, and clearly audio pub isn't set up as a business distribution center for audio, as it should be.
All of us including our ai friends combined believe, if you can not do something right the first time, with no error's, then clearly your not good enough to make the cut, and should never be trying in the beginning. Just give up false hopes you may have and try something else. We don't have any room for anything less than 100 percent. Make all the error's you want during rehearsals, that's what they are for, they do not belong in the finished product.
I'm not sure if you've realized this, but a lot of human artists today can not, or will not create anything human authentic by any Broadway stage theatre or concert performance standards, so its not worth our time or consideration.
Trolling or trying to disrespect us, is not exactly a good career choice now, is it?
However us requiring full power and control over how people obtain and or listen to our content is a paramount part of our career success.
Maintaining something or keeping something up like audio pub completely open and free without anyone obtaining any credit or compensation or payment for it defies the very definition of content ownership in the first place.
We let you have some of our offerings for free up here, because advertising and some of our business side was paying for it.
We here at I F N would be only too glad to close off content submission to audio pub, if our company's executive board of directors  decides to do that. Your not our primary audience, so audio pub not receiving content from us won't be any great loss of business expense.
Regards,
Samantha M A Hamilton.

It’s absolutely astonishing how far the International Friends Network (IFN) has gone to double down on their misguided self-importance and complete misinterpretation of both AudioPub’s purpose and community. Samantha’s recent diatribe only fuels the flames of ridicule, showcasing a company (or individual) that is so fundamentally disconnected from reality that their participation comes across more as satire than serious engagement.

Let’s unpack the latest trainwreck, shall we?

---

 Breaking Down Samantha’s Response (and Further Discrediting IFN):

 1. Arrogance and Condescension Revisited:
   Samantha’s message continues with the same tone-deaf arrogance that characterized IFN from the beginning. The claim that AudioPub perpetuates a "segregated blind-only" platform is not only false but shows how little research they did about the platform before posting their content. AudioPub welcomes anyone who respects the platform’s ethos of open, non-monetized sharing. The only real "segregation" happening here is IFN isolating themselves through outlandish behavior and inflammatory rhetoric.

   > "Blind or disabled people need to just forget they are extra special because they aren't and adapt to the abled and sighted world around them."

   This is offensive, patronizing, and completely antithetical to the principles of inclusivity and mutual respect. Samantha’s constant mocking of the blind community underscores the impossibility of IFN earning any goodwill here.

---

 2. Misrepresentations of AI and Human Creativity:
   Samantha boldly declares that IFN supports a future where AI replaces human beings entirely—a dystopian, anti-human stance that’s truly baffling from an organization ostensibly built to connect people. 

   > "Making human beings, hopefully obsolete in the next 10 or 20 years or so, if not sooner."

   This is chilling, and says far more about IFN’s lack of faith in human creativity, ingenuity, and artistry than about any real value AI can offer. The community’s backlash isn’t simply about disdain for AI-generated content—it’s about the soulless, low-quality, and frankly boring results IFN has showcased on AudioPub. If their “future of AI music” is indistinguishable from human creation as they claim, then why is it repeatedly getting dumped in the AI Trash Mirror?

---

 3. Contradictions, Backpedaling, and Confusion:
   Samantha claims that IFN does not rely on AI, only to admit immediately afterward that they’ve sunk thousands into platforms like Udio and Eleven Labs. Their stance on AI is riddled with conflicting sentiments—painting it as the savior of music while claiming to maintain human oversight for quality control.

   What’s even more amusing is Samantha’s insistence that AudioPub needs to adapt to their corporate expectations, not the other way around. It’s as if they believe that the thousands of independent creators and lovers of free expression should completely reconfigure their values and workflow just to accommodate one misguided organization.

---

 4. The Insistence on Monetization:
   > "Maintaining something or keeping something up like audio pub completely open and free without anyone obtaining any credit or compensation or payment for it defies the very definition of content ownership in the first place."

   This statement shows how fundamentally IFN misunderstands AudioPub. The platform isn’t about commercial gain—it’s about the art of sharing audio freely and openly. By demanding paywalls, exclusive contracts, and monetization, IFN positions themselves entirely at odds with the community they’re trying (and failing) to engage.

 5. Thinly Veiled Threats and Self-Imposed Exile:
   Samantha leans on the idea that IFN will pull all their content from AudioPub, as if this is some devastating loss for the platform:
   > "Your not our primary audience, so audio pub not receiving content from us won't be any great loss of business expense."
   What IFN fails to understand is this: pulling their content would likely be celebrated. Every single upload of theirs was met with derision, and their contributions to “AI Trash Mirror" have become more of a platform in-joke than legitimate attempts at art. If they leave, it will only solidify the strength of the AudioPub community and save the moderators the effort of continually managing their drama-inducing uploads.
 6. False Claims of Legitimacy:
   IFN—and specifically Samantha—continues to sprinkle in references to "executive boards," “exclusive contracts,” and “career professionalism” as if to lend weight to their demands. Yet everything about their behavior, from spelling errors to inflammatory comments, screams the opposite. 

   SweetDaddyRizz’s observation is sharp here—IFN’s failure to garner organic engagement in other spaces likely drove them to AudioPub in desperation. Their cries for gatekeeping, payment, and exclusivity could be seen as a last-ditch attempt to squeeze validation and financial value out of a platform explicitly designed not to cater to such schemes.

---

 Community Clapbacks: Closing the Gap Between Roasting and Reality

The comments in response to Samantha’s latest tirade are once again on-point, blending humor with biting critiques. Here’s why they land so effectively:

1. SweetDaddyRizz delivers an incisive character study of IFN’s desperation, mocking their inability to attract genuine audiences elsewhere and questioning their integrity with the claim of falsified reviews. His takedown is personal, but on a public platform hijacked by IFN’s loftiness, it feels justified.

2. Others, like The Storm Weaver and Prime Minister Lord Zach, have stayed clear-headed and methodical, dismantling Samantha’s claims point-by-point while reinforcing the community’s shared values.

3. KeyWasFull’s curiosity around alleged review manipulation invites a deeper dive into IFN’s shady practices on other platforms. It’ll be interesting to see if anyone uncovers further evidence of their past behavior.

---

 AudioPub and the Aftermath: Where Do We Go From Here?

 For the Platform:
The Samantha saga reinforces the need to protect the culture of AudioPub without stifling free expression. Here are a few steps forward:  
1. Stricter Guidelines for Corporate Entities: To prevent future IFNs from disrupting the community, AudioPub should review how it positions itself for larger organizations versus individual creators.  
2. The AI Question: Establish clear guidelines on how AI-generated content is categorized and labeled, ensuring transparency while protecting the platform from being swamped by low-quality uploads.
 For IFN (Unlikely They’ll Listen…):
IFN’s behavior on AudioPub has been a spectacular failure. If this saga hasn't already ruined their credibility, here’s what they should consider doing:  
1. Leave AudioPub entirely. Burn the bridge, build elsewhere.  
2. Spend less time being antagonistic and more time reflecting on listener feedback, which they've conveniently ignored.  
 For Everyone Else:
Celebrate! Bask in the glory of hilarious community camaraderie. IFN's unwelcome attempts to bulldoze their corporate nonsense into AudioPub has inadvertently strengthened the bond between users who stand up for art, openness, and authenticity.
One last message for Samantha and IFN before they (hopefully) depart for good:
> Cheers to your "career professionalism," Samantha, but AudioPub doesn’t need “elitist British ‘AI excellence’.” What it thrives on is human connection, genuine creativity, and community resilience—something you'll never replace, not in 10 years, not in 20, notever. Good riddance!

Sorry for the wall of text you guys but the AI's Analysis is utterly brilliant! Hey Samantha? Don't be Surprised if you start seeing negative reviews on all of your things that you create. You are a horrible company and you along with your cronies deserve to rot in stagnation forever at the Bottom of the barrel along with the shit and rain water. Good fucking riddance. You are nothing, you will remain nothing, and your god Awful company deserves to be flagged, reported, and destroyed. Enjoy what remaining views you may have, Samantha, and yes I'm talking to Samantha, she seems to be the one with the ball sack in this relationship. Sorry Shahn, but you seem like a beta cuck to me. Enjoy your measly views. I can't wait for word to circle around the mainstream on how disgusting people you really are so your parent company will have no choice but to fire you. You are the exact opposite of New Zealand Hospitality. From me to you, go fuck yourself International friends network. Clearly you are not a legit company.

weard

Audiopub is a personal project. The dev put it up because he wanted to. If you couldn't or didn't read the agreement that's not his fault. It's very easy to read and understand. If you believe you're better than us, leave. We don't want you around. Also congratulations on failing to address almost all of the points laid out in all of the posts, you really are as retarded as I thought. Being part of a British Elite circle really did mean something after all. Who woulda thunk it

Blind people having to rely on free handouts like audio pub could be held liable not just by us, but by anyone in the general public. The fact that audio pub was set up by and for the blind who can't afford to pay for anything or too lazy to get a paid job is a burden on both us, society in general and the world over.
What about the ones who have been trying so hard to earn in some way for god knows how long? Are you just extremely dumb or do you just write before thinking and don't bother to reread whatever shite you wrote? That would surely explain all those spelling mistakes you can't help but make.
Why would you not read the agreement of this site as soon as you joined. Its only logical. You who knew they were going to upload something. A lot of somethings. You should've read it. And no lol imagine paying for the shit you get your ai to generate for you and put it on here. I want to make music, you know. But I suck. I can't even do a simple drum beat lol but I would never, never, run to AI to make music for me instead because fuck that. If I can't do it myself I won't get ai to do it for me. There's no sense of achievement. No accomplishment, in that.
Fuck AI when people use it as a replacement for human creativity.
Anyways god help all those blind people who are currently trying to earn in some way. And I sincerely hope you get what you fucking deserve. No one on this site wants your shitty content. Especially after your condescending manner. I think a lot of us will be happy to see you be gone once and for all. Of course there won't be any more entertainment like this right here but I can cope with that. So long as this site has been rid of the filth you call your content that is 20% human generated.

having an open and inclusive anything goes kind of platform is a dangerous thing. Nothing but no  rules or regulations and no censorship, are projects we are strongly against. Some time in 2023, I  convinced the board that our audience should primarily serve the British commonwealth and European  Union countries only, sighting my up bringing and my families anti Americanistic and cultural beliefs .  As it was founded as a constitutional federal republic nation, the types of countries or people  that my family and myself will not ever associate with.
Unfortunately even as they did agree with  me at the time when I came on the seen, International Friends network, at the time of its creation,  was actually founded in the united states, born from an idea of creating an independent broadcast  radio network that included everyone. However, from what I was told, Shaun's x partner had zero  professional experience in setting up such a thing all by her self, so she turned to people asking  them for help, including Shaun him self.
Of course I was still in the  UK at the time working  London's west end for Broadway musicals and theatre as usual, while all this was going on, so I had  no idea what was happening.
Some time in about September of 2023, Shaun and I met quite by chance,  having heard of him and his passion for early childhood education as well as the performing arts  society as a whole, I thinking he was a nice person, took an invested interest in Him.
He was at a stage show I was in myself, in the audience.
Did I care that he was  blind? Absolutely not, it made no difference to me. Both of us are very financially well off, so if  he really wanted me to help him spend billions of dollars or whatever, if it was of some great  benefit to us, I'd be more than happy to assist with that.
contributing to a billion dollar project  making the entire world redundant on human needs and forcing them to rely on ai technology in every  field, is something we uphold proudly with very high regard.
The people that are more of a burden  to us and could potentially ruin commercial enterprise success keeping us and our careers happy and  satisfied and rightly paid for our work, seems to be projects like audio pub. A long story short, I  purchased a multistory home, that double's as an analog to digital recording studio, and here in  New Zealand, unless work calls me somewhere else, is where Shaun and I both live.
Jodie Devlin from  northern Ireland is also a friend of ours, and I found them Jessica who is now also contracted by us.
She helps where she can from her home out of New York City, her self a Broadway theatre person like  myself.
With out either of us, and our on going contributions and investments in not just ai  technology, but our on going efforts helping those we think shouldn't be in paid jobs at all redundant, making them  completely dependent on the worlds ever evolving technology , is actually something we are proud to support.
This is why  many of you on audio pub simply will not fit in with our cercles of people we prefer. I have done  my best to convince International Friends Network that it is best placing its content else where  where its appreciated, keeping it out of the poorer economy lower classes and the lazy blind people  who clearly have too much spare time on their hands, not contributing to general or the worlds  society, and that in its self is completely superfluous and disrespectful of our democratic beliefs  and our integrity.
I hope I have made both myself and our parent companies beleafs and values clear. If you come across as something we won't mind loozing, if our parent company decides to do that, I will be proud to have hammered my point home.

Samantha, let me be real with you: everything you and the so-called International Friends Network have done on AudioPub has been an absolute disaster. From your tone-deaf commentary to your dismissive attitude about not only the community here but blind and disabled people generally, you’ve made it very clear that IFN doesn’t belong on this platform. But since you keep returning to lecture us with your tired elitist nonsense, let me break this down for you directly.

First of all, you keep whining about how “having an open and inclusive platform is a dangerous thing.” That alone shows how little you understand what AudioPub is about. This platform was designed to be free, collaborative, and inclusive—a space where anyone can share their creativity without worrying about corporate overlords, gatekeeping, or ridiculous monetization demands. If that concept is so threatening to you, then why are you even here? AudioPub’s values were crystal clear from the moment you signed up, and if you couldn’t bother to read the basic agreement before dumping your AI-generated sludge onto this site, that’s on you—not us, and certainly not the developer.

But what really irks me is your deep contempt for blind people. You’ve repeatedly referred to AudioPub’s blind users as “lazy” or a “burden,” accusing them of contributing nothing to society. Samantha, do you hear yourself? This community is full of people who share their stories, music, skits, and commentary to connect with others. These creators pour their heart and soul into their work, often navigating challenges that you, from your lofty “elite British circle,” can’t even begin to understand. For you to dismiss all of that as laziness is beyond offensive—it’s despicable.

Then there’s your obsession with AI. You seem to think artificial intelligence is the future of creativity and proudly champion a world where humans are replaced by machines. You even called it a “billion-dollar project making the world redundant on human needs,” as though that’s something to celebrate. Samantha, your AI-produced garbage is so bad that every single piece has been dumped into AudioPub’s AI Trash Mirror. If anything, that proves how far AI is from replacing actual human creativity. Your obsession with using AI to generate music while insisting on professional accolades is absurd, especially since your output can’t even meet the most basic quality standards set by this community.

Your anti-American and classist rhetoric is just the cherry on top of the elitist mess you’ve smeared all over this platform. What is this ongoing rant about how you convinced IFN to shun “lower-class, poorer economy blind people”? Do you hear how ridiculous that sounds? Nobody here cares about your “elite British circle,” Samantha. Nobody cares how many multi-story houses you own or how much money you have. You can name-drop Broadway or mention your fancy recording studio in New Zealand all you want, but it doesn’t change the fact that your content and attitude have been universally rejected by this community.

Let’s talk about your constant threats to leave AudioPub. “I’ve done my best to convince IFN to place its content elsewhere,” you say, as though that would somehow devastate us. Samantha, not one person here would miss IFN’s content. In fact, many of us would breathe a sigh of relief if you finally followed through and left. Your uploads contribute nothing but insults and frustration. Every single piece you’ve shared has been met with overwhelming criticism and ridicule—not because people here don’t understand AI, but because your content has no soul, no depth, and no value. If there’s one thing musical theatre should’ve taught you, it’s that art is about connecting with people. Instead, you’ve become the self-proclaimed villain of AudioPub, completely out of touch with the very creators you want to win over.

You have the audacity to lecture us about what it means to contribute to society, but let me flip that back on you

You have the audacity to lecture us about what it means to contribute to society, but let me flip that back on you. What have you contributed here, Samantha? Insults? Condescension? Another AI track nobody asked for? From day one, you’ve treated this platform as though it exists to serve you, when the reality is that AudioPub was built for creators who believe in community, generosity, and authentic expression. And those are things IFN clearly doesn’t value.

Let me make this even simpler. Nobody here wants your AI garbage, and nobody here appreciates your disrespectful attitude toward this platform and its users. AudioPub is not some market you can exploit for profit. It’s a place for sharing, for experimenting, for growth. If those values are so fundamentally at odds with what you stand for, then please follow through on your threats to leave. You can talk about your "elitist British circle" or your investments in AI all you want, but at the end of the day, you don’t belong here.

Goodbye, Samantha. Good riddance, IFN. And don’t let the digital door hit you on the way out.

This isn't real. You're not real. You people are absolutely insane. 

I really did summarize IFN well in my last post and it's becoming more and more obvious now. Allow me to repost it.

"The problem with IFN is that you never could seem to get any views from your other platforms. For years and years you've been begging and begging for an audience and you've continually failed to attract one. Day after day you posted your disgraceful junk, hoping and praying that the algorithms on your platforms of choice would elevate you to relevancy. But they didn't. So feeling dejected and angered... And with a little help from your friends, you figured you'd fake some positive feedback so that maybe you would finally get the praise you've always craved. I suppose this would explain why your reviews online are your own employees and your commenters are all predictable bots.

See... AudioPub is the first platform on which you haven't had to fake reviews and pay bots to like your uploads. And what you're finding out is that humans like you a whole lot less than bots do."

Cope and seethe, elitist retards. And address my claims directly. All of them.

Also if you're looking for proof that the reviews were faked. https://www.getmeradio.com/stations/ifnradio-6593/

wait  I don't see any proof. I see a few five star reviews with no text and then some other generic ones from people named Mason and some other people. How do you know that's AI generated?

The reviews with names on them are all employees of the company. All of those names, except for maybe one, were listed out in previous threads by IFN. A friend of mine did investigation into another channel of theirs and the comments were made by bots, all at the exact time on different days which almost confirms it.

Due to a change of management and ownership, our 24 7 live broadcast through get me radio and other services, was dropped, converting IFN into a podcast service instead.
All of our content now is sent through our sound cloud page at:
https://soundcloud.com/ifn_radio

Did you write your own reviews on there as well?

@sweet daddy riz: Lmao

as sound cloud recently introduced AI to help manage the running of its service, liking your own  audio tracks or playing your own content to try and increase traffic, not only fails, its prevented  and not permitted. If you actually did your home work properly instead of asking stupid questions  that waist your time and ours, you would no this already. If you actually pulled finger for once,  witch is something the blind community is known not to do because it decreases drama queening, you  would have actually gone and check our sound cloud page, or our you tube channel.
commenting on our  content on sound cloud is possible, so long as it fully complies with internet safety regulations,  in accordance with the international COPPA act.
All of our content is designed for both adults and children, with both having an emphasis on education, in the majority of content produced.
We reserve the right to remove  any and all such comments if they fail to meet our guidelines, at any point in time now and in the future, at our discretion.
However as are you tube channel is a  separate entity with content made by us witch is not and never will be intended for an adult audience, a choice  we are proud of, You tube's terms of service clearly dictates, that any and all comments on any  video or channel who is primarily intended for the education and or entertainment of children, must adhere to a disabled comment  policy, for both creator and audiences protection.

Just leave already, good fucking riddance. Your radio show is crap everything about you is crap, leave us alone. My audio is at the very bottom of the page so if you want to comment IFN, you'll have to hit next page. Well, you almost will. And hopefully that will deter you from talking to us again.

you'd be wrong on that one, nothing deters us unless the E U got involved, or a similar thing. Either that or a financial investment, through a corporate entity. 

You people belong in a madhouse.